December 11th, 2008
Eight foreign executives, including Hioki, were arrested on May 2, 2007, in Houston and San Francisco and charged for their roles in the marine hose cartel, following their participation in a cartel meeting in Houston. In December 2007, Bryan Allison and David Brammar, executives with Dunlop Oil Marine Ltd., a manufacturer of marine hose located in Grimsby, U.K., pleaded guilty to participating in the marine hose conspiracy. Under the terms of their plea agreements, Allison was sentenced to pay a $100,000 criminal fine and agreed to serve 24 months in prison, and Brammar was sentenced to pay a $75,000 criminal fine and agreed to serve 20 months in prison. On Dec. 1, 2008, Dunlop agreed to plead guilty to participating in the conspiracy. Under the terms of his plea agreement, which is subject to court approval, Dunlop agreed to pay $4.54 million and cooperate in the Department's ongoing antitrust investigation. Another arrested executive, Peter Whittle, a former Dunlop executive and now the sole proprietor of PW Consulting (Oil Marine) Ltd., pleaded guilty for his leadership role in the conspiracy in December 2007, was sentenced to pay a $100,000 criminal fine and agreed to serve 30 months in prison.
Allison, Brammar and Whittle also were arrested and criminally charged with cartel offenses by U.K. authorities. On Nov. 14, 2008, the U.K. Court of Appeal sentenced Allison to serve 24 months in prison, Brammar to serve 20 months in prison and Whittle to serve 30 months in prison. The U.S. plea agreements in effect provided for concurrent prison sentences in the United States and in the U.K. Thus, because the U.K. prison sentences either matched or exceeded the sentences recommended in the U.S. plea agreements, the defendants were not required to serve prison sentences in the United States.
In addition, Uwe Bangert, a German national and former executive with Dunlop's former parent company, Phoenix AG, was indicted on July 19, 2007, for his participation in the marine hose cartel. A trial date has not been set.
Manuli Rubber Industries SpA (Manuli), Robert L. Furness, the former president of Manuli's former Plantation, Fla.-based subsidiary, and Charles J. Gillespie, a former Manuli regional sales manager, have pleaded guilty for their roles in this conspiracy. On Dec. 5, 2008, Manuli was sentenced to pay a criminal fine of $2 million. Under the terms of the plea agreements, which are subject to court approval, Furness has agreed to serve 14 months in prison and to pay a $75,000 criminal fine, and Gillespie has agreed to serve 12 months and one day in prison and to pay a $20,000 criminal fine. Manuli, Furness and Gillespie also have agreed to cooperate fully in the Department's ongoing antitrust investigation.
Francesco Scaglia, the deputy manager of Manuli's Oil Marine Division, and Val M. Northcutt, another regional sales manager, were acquitted on Nov. 11, 2008, in the Southern District of Florida after being charged with participating in the conspiracy.
Christian Caleca and Jacques Cognard, executives with Trelleborg Industrie S.A.S., pleaded guilty to charges stemming from their roles in the conspiracy. In December 2007, each was sentenced to serve 14 months in prison. Caleca was sentenced to pay a $75,000 criminal fine and Cognard was sentenced to pay a $100,000 criminal fine. Giovanni Scodeggio, an Italian citizen who is the manager of Parker ITR S.r.l.'s Oil Gas Business Unit, pleaded guilty to a one-count felony charge in U.S. District Court in Houston in August 2008. Scodeggio was sentenced to pay a criminal fine of $20,000 and to serve six months of house arrest. Caleca, Cognard and Scodeggio have agreed to cooperate fully in the Department's ongoing antitrust investigation.
The investigation of the conspiracies is being conducted by the Antitrust Division's National Criminal Enforcement Section, the Criminal Division's Fraud Section, the Defense Criminal Investigative Service (DCIS) of the Department of Defense's Office of Inspector General, the U.S. Navy Criminal Investigative Service and the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Law enforcement agencies from multiple foreign jurisdictions are investigating or assisting in the ongoing matter.
"Price fixing and bid rigging are serious crimes that drain resources from the Department of Defense and the American taxpayer. The Defense Criminal Investigative Service takes very seriously all violations of U.S. antitrust laws that affect products and services procured for our soldiers, sailors, airmen and Marines. DCIS aggressively investigates those who seek to cheat the DOD and the public by conspiring to suppress competition," said Sharon Woods, Director, DCIS.
Today's charge is an example of the Department's commitment to protect U.S. taxpayers from public procurement fraud through its creation of the National Procurement Fraud Task Force. The National Procurement Fraud Initiative, announced in October 2006, is designed to promote the early detection, identification, prevention and prosecution of procurement fraud associated with the increase in contracting activity for national security and other government programs.
Anyone with information concerning bid rigging or other anticompetitive conduct in the marine hose industry is urged to call the National Criminal Enforcement Section of the Antitrust Division at 202-307-6694, or the Long Beach, Calif., Resident Agency of the Defense Criminal Investigative Service at 562-256-2501. Anyone with information concerning corrupt payments to foreign officials is urged to e-mail the Fraud Section of the Criminal Division at FCPA.Fraud@usdoj.gov or call (202) 514-7023.
Top 10 >>> Read more...
- Mood:boisterous
- Music:Daft Punk
By Assemblymember Dave Jones
The California Air Resources Board (CARB) is poised to make a decision that could dramatically undercut the state’s effort to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Whether or not CARB will act decisively to include better land use as a part of the effort to reduce global warming remains to be seen.
Virtually every day there is a story in the media about new evidence of accelerated climate change and the impact that it will have on our environment and the economy. Disturbingly, all signs point to the fact that the changes in California’s climate and the resultant impacts on our water supply, agriculture, recreation, and habitats will be severe. Disruptions to our economy and lifestyles are looming and the clock is ticking on implementing solutions that will slow down the release of greenhouse gases.
Fortunately, California is taking the lead nationally on the fight against climate change Assembly Bill 32, the Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, states that by the year 2020, we must reduce our emissions of greenhouse gases to levels that existed in 1990. The task of implementing AB 32 was given to the California Air Resources Board, or CARB.
CARB is on the verge of adopting what is know as the Scoping Plan, which will lay out a the parameters for meeting the goals of AB 32. The Scoping Plan will include standards that each greenhouse gas-emitting sector of the economy will have to meet in the form of reduced emissions of carbon dioxide, as expressed in million metric tons per year (MMTCO2E). Sectors include transportation, agriculture, industry, electricity (power generation), and land use. Each sector will be subject to specific targets.
How we develop land in our cities, suburbs and rural areas can have an enormous impact on carbon dioxide emissions. Sprawling development patterns with little public transit, for example, require people to drive greater distances to get to and from work, shopping, or recreation, as compared to more compact development with jobs, shopping, schools and recreation within walking or bicycling distance or served by public transit. The more people have to drive, the more carbon dioxide is emitted.
Americano top 10 >>> Read more...
The California Air Resources Board (CARB) is poised to make a decision that could dramatically undercut the state’s effort to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Whether or not CARB will act decisively to include better land use as a part of the effort to reduce global warming remains to be seen.
Virtually every day there is a story in the media about new evidence of accelerated climate change and the impact that it will have on our environment and the economy. Disturbingly, all signs point to the fact that the changes in California’s climate and the resultant impacts on our water supply, agriculture, recreation, and habitats will be severe. Disruptions to our economy and lifestyles are looming and the clock is ticking on implementing solutions that will slow down the release of greenhouse gases.
Fortunately, California is taking the lead nationally on the fight against climate change Assembly Bill 32, the Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, states that by the year 2020, we must reduce our emissions of greenhouse gases to levels that existed in 1990. The task of implementing AB 32 was given to the California Air Resources Board, or CARB.
CARB is on the verge of adopting what is know as the Scoping Plan, which will lay out a the parameters for meeting the goals of AB 32. The Scoping Plan will include standards that each greenhouse gas-emitting sector of the economy will have to meet in the form of reduced emissions of carbon dioxide, as expressed in million metric tons per year (MMTCO2E). Sectors include transportation, agriculture, industry, electricity (power generation), and land use. Each sector will be subject to specific targets.
How we develop land in our cities, suburbs and rural areas can have an enormous impact on carbon dioxide emissions. Sprawling development patterns with little public transit, for example, require people to drive greater distances to get to and from work, shopping, or recreation, as compared to more compact development with jobs, shopping, schools and recreation within walking or bicycling distance or served by public transit. The more people have to drive, the more carbon dioxide is emitted.
Americano top 10 >>> Read more...
- Mood:joyous
- Music:Madonna
